Worshippers of Death
Alan M.
Dershowitz
March 3,
2008
Zahra
Maladan is an educated woman who edits a women's magazine in
At the
recent funeral for the assassinated Hezbollah terrorist Imad Moughnayaj -- the
mass murderer responsible for killing 241 marines in 1983 and more than 100
women, children and men in Buenos Aires in 1992 and 1994 -- Ms. Maladan was
quoted in the New York Times giving the following warning to her son: "if
you're not going to follow the steps of the Islamic resistance martyrs, then I
don't want you."
Zahra
Maladan represents a dramatic shift in the way we must fight to protect our
citizens against enemies who are sworn to kill them by killing themselves. The
traditional paradigm was that mothers who love their children want them to live
in peace, marry and produce grandchildren. Women in general,
and mothers in particular, were seen as a counterweight to male belligerence.
The picture of the mother weeping as her son is led off to battle -- even a
just battle -- has been a constant and powerful image.
Now there
is a new image of mothers urging their children to die, and then celebrating
the martyrdom of their suicidal sons and daughters by distributing sweets and
singing wedding songs. More and more young women -- some married with infant
children -- are strapping bombs to their (sometimes pregnant) bellies, because
they have been taught to love death rather than life. Look at what is being
preached by some influential Islamic leaders:
"We
are going to win, because they love life and we love death," said Hassan
Nasrallah, the leader of Hezbollah. He has also said: "[E]ach of us lives
his days and nights hoping more than anything to be killed for the sake of
Allah." Shortly after 9/11, Osama bin Laden told a reporter: "We love
death. The
"The
Americans love Pepsi-Cola, we love death," explained Afghani al Qaeda
operative Maulana Inyadullah. Sheik Feiz Mohammed, leader of the Global Islamic
Youth Center in
How
should Western democracies fight against an enemy whose leaders preach a
preference for death?
The two
basic premises of conventional warfare have long been that soldiers and
civilians prefer living to dying and can thus be deterred from killing by the
fear of being killed; and that combatants (soldiers) can easily be
distinguished from noncombatants (women, children, the elderly, the infirm and
other ordinary citizens). These premises are being challenged by women like
Zahra Maladan. Neither she nor her son -- if he listens to his mother -- can be
deterred from killing by the fear of being killed. They must be prevented from
succeeding in their ghoulish quest for martyrdom. Prevention, however, carries
a high risk of error. The woman walking toward the group of soldiers or
civilians might well be an innocent civilian. A moment's hesitation may cost
innocent lives. But a failure to hesitate may also have a price.
Late last
month, a young female bomber was shot as she approached some shops in central
As more women and children are recruited by their mothers and their
religious leaders to become suicide bombers, more women and children will be
shot at -- some mistakenly. That too is part of the grand plan of our enemies. They
want us to kill their civilians, who they also consider martyrs, because when
we accidentally kill a civilian, they win in the court of public opinion. One
Western diplomat called this the "harsh arithmetic of pain," whereby
civilian casualties on both sides "play in their favor." Democracies
lose, both politically and emotionally, when they kill civilians, even
inadvertently. As Golda Meir once put it: "We can
perhaps someday forgive you for killing our children, but we cannot forgive you
for making us kill your children."
Civilian
casualties also increase when terrorists operate from within civilian enclaves
and hide behind human shields. This relatively new phenomenon undercuts the
second basic premise of conventional warfare: Combatants can easily be
distinguished from noncombatants. Has Zahra Maladan become a combatant by
urging her son to blow himself up? Have the religious leaders who preach a
culture of death lost their status as noncombatants? What about
"civilians" who willingly allow themselves to be used as human
shields? Or their homes as launching pads for terrorist rockets?
The
traditional sharp distinction between soldiers in uniform and civilians in
nonmilitary garb has given way to a continuum. At the more civilian end are
babies and true noncombatants; at the more military end are the religious
leaders who incite mass murder; in the middle are ordinary citizens who
facilitate, finance or encourage terrorism. There are no hard and fast lines of
demarcation, and mistakes are inevitable -- as the terrorists well understand.
We need
new rules, strategies and tactics to deal effectively and fairly with these
dangerous new realities. We cannot simply wait until the son of Zahra Maladan
-- and the sons and daughters of hundreds of others like her -- decide to
follow his mother's demand. We must stop them before they export their sick and
dangerous culture of death to our shores.
Mr. Dershowitz
teaches law at